About cookies on this site Our websites require some cookies to function properly (required). In addition, other cookies may be used with your consent to analyze site usage, improve the user experience and for advertising. For more information, please review your options. By visiting our website, you agree to our processing of information as described in IBM’sprivacy statement. To provide a smooth navigation, your cookie preferences will be shared across the IBM web domains listed here.
Publication
MICRO 2018
Conference paper
Morphable counters: Enabling compact integrity trees for low-overhead secure memories
Abstract
Securing off-chip main memory is essential for protection from adversaries with physical access to systems. However, current secure-memory designs incur considerable performance overheads-A major cause being the multiple memory accesses required for traversing an integrity-Tree, that provides protection against man-in-The-middle attacks or replay attacks. In this paper, we provide a scalable solution to this problem by proposing a compact integrity tree design that requires fewer memory accesses for its traversal. We enable this by proposing new storage-efficient representations for the counters used for encryption and integrity-Tree in secure memories. Our Morphable Counters are more cacheable on-chip, as they provide more counters per cacheline than existing split counters. Additionally, they incur lower overheads due to counter-overflows, by dynamically switching between counter representations based on usage pattern. We show that using Morphable Counters enables a 128-Ary integrity-Tree, that can improve performance by 6.3% on average (up to 28.3%) and reduce system energy-delay product by 8.8% on average, compared to an aggressive baseline using split counters with a 64-Ary integrity-Tree. These benefits come without any additional storage or reduction in security and are derived from our compact counter representation, that reduces the integrity-Tree size for a 16GB memory from 4MB in the baseline to 1MB. Compared to recently proposed VAULT, our design provides a speedup of 13.5% on average (up to 47.4%).