About cookies on this site Our websites require some cookies to function properly (required). In addition, other cookies may be used with your consent to analyze site usage, improve the user experience and for advertising. For more information, please review your options. By visiting our website, you agree to our processing of information as described in IBM’sprivacy statement. To provide a smooth navigation, your cookie preferences will be shared across the IBM web domains listed here.
Publication
Journal of Hypertension
Paper
Geometry-independent inclusion of basalmyocardium yields improved cardiacmagnetic resonance agreement with echocardiography and necropsy quantified left-ventricular mass
Abstract
Objectives: Left-ventricular mass (LVM) is widely used to guide clinical decision-making. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) quantifies LVM by planimetry of contiguous shortaxis images, an approach dependent on reader-selection of images to be contoured. Established methods have applied different binary cut-offs using circumferential extent of left-ventricular myocardium to define the basal left ventricle (LV), omitting images containing lesser fractions of left-ventricular myocardium. This study tested impact of basal slice variability on LVM quantification. Methods: CMR was performed in patients and laboratory animals. LVM was quantified with full inclusion of leftventricular myocardium, and by established methods that use different cut-offs to define the left-ventricular basalmost slice: 50% circumferential myocardium at end diastole alone (ED50), 50% circumferential myocardium throughout both end diastole and end systole (EDS50). Results: One hundred and fifty patients and 10 lab animals were studied. Among patients, fully inclusive LVM (172.6±42.3 g) was higher vs. ED50 (167.2±41.8 g) and EDS50 (150.6±41.1 g; both P<0.001). Methodological differences yielded discrepancies regarding proportion of patients meeting established criteria for left-ventricular hypertrophy and chamber dilation (P<0.05). Fully inclusive LVM yielded smaller differences with echocardiography (δ=11.0±28.8 g) than did ED50 (δ=16.4±29.1 g) and EDS50 (δ=33.2±28.7 g; both P<0.001). Among lab animals, ex-vivo left-ventricular weight (69.8±13.2 g) was similar to LVM calculated using fully inclusive (70.1±13.5 g, P=0.67) and ED50 (69.4±13.9 g; P=0.70) methods, whereas EDS50 differed significantly (67.9±14.9 g; P=0.04). Conclusion: Established CMR methods that discordantly define the basal-most LV produce significant differences in calculated LVM. Fully inclusive quantification, rather than binary cut-offs that omit basal left-ventricular myocardium, yields smallest CMR discrepancy with echocardiographymeasured LVM and non-significant differences with necropsy-measured left-ventricular weight. © 2013 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.