QALD-3: Multilingual question answering over linked data
Elena Cabrio, Philipp Cimiano, et al.
CLEF 2013
The traditional purpose of physical synthesis is to perform timing closure , i.e., to create a placed design that meets its timing specifications while also satisfying electrical, routability, and signal integrity constraints. In modern design flows, physical synthesis tools hardly ever achieve this goal in their first iteration. The design team must iterate by studying the output of the physical synthesis run, then potentially massage the input, e.g., by changing the floorplan, timing assertions, pin locations, logic structures, etc., in order to hopefully achieve a better solution for the next iteration. The complexity of physical synthesis means that systems can take days to run on designs with multimillions of placeable objects, which severely hurts design productivity. This paper discusses some newer techniques that have been deployed within IBM's physical synthesis tool called PDS that significantly improves throughput. In particular, we focus on some of the biggest contributors to runtime, placement, legalization, buffering, and electric correction, and present techniques that generate significant turnaround time improvements © 2007 IEEE.
Elena Cabrio, Philipp Cimiano, et al.
CLEF 2013
Rafae Bhatti, Elisa Bertino, et al.
Communications of the ACM
Fan Zhang, Junwei Cao, et al.
IEEE TETC
Preeti Malakar, Thomas George, et al.
SC 2012