About cookies on this site Our websites require some cookies to function properly (required). In addition, other cookies may be used with your consent to analyze site usage, improve the user experience and for advertising. For more information, please review your options. By visiting our website, you agree to our processing of information as described in IBM’sprivacy statement. To provide a smooth navigation, your cookie preferences will be shared across the IBM web domains listed here.
Paper
Simple and perovskite oxides of transition-metals: Why some are metallic, while most are insulating
Abstract
Some 76 simple and perovskite transition-metal oxides are classified as "metals," "insulators," and those exhibiting metal-insulator transitions. Using the framework of Zaanen, Sawatzky, and Allen and a simple ionic model to estimate the two relevant energies (Δ0 and U′0), we can find boundaries which separate the insulating oxides from two types of metals: low Δ0 metals and low U′0 metals. In addition, compounds with metal-insulator transitions are found to be on (or near) these boundaries. It is concluded that the large differences in conductivity behavior of oxides are largely due to differences in the ionization potentials of the transition metal cations. © 1991.