About cookies on this site Our websites require some cookies to function properly (required). In addition, other cookies may be used with your consent to analyze site usage, improve the user experience and for advertising. For more information, please review your options. By visiting our website, you agree to our processing of information as described in IBM’sprivacy statement. To provide a smooth navigation, your cookie preferences will be shared across the IBM web domains listed here.
Publication
Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology B: Microelectronics and Nanometer Structures
Paper
Experimental optimization of the electron-beam proximity effect forward scattering parameter
Abstract
The electron-beam forward scattering parameter α characterizes the width of the incident beam plus an additional radius due to scattering of primary electrons in the resist. These "forward scattering" effects can be included in proximity-effect correction algorithms by using the point-spread energy function generated by a Monte Carlo simulation. Alternatively, correction algorithms may use a superposition of Gaussian functions to fit Monte Carlo simulations or to fit experimental data. Long-range (Β>10 μm) effects due to electrons backscattered from the substrate are well characterized by simulations; however, forward scattering effects are difficult to model or measure. Experimental methods of measuring α include the exposure of dot arrays, line arrays, or so-called "doughnut" patterns over a large range of doses. Proximity parameters are then inferred indirectly through fitting line and dot widths. We have instead used a simpler and faster technique based on the method of [Dubonos, Microelectron. Eng. 21, 293 (1993)] which uses a liftoff technique to choose the optimal value of the forward scattering parameter α. We have applied this technique to determine α for 100 kV exposure of poly(methyl methacrylate) and KRS resists. Negative resist presents more of a challenge, and so a method of optimizing α for negative resists is presented. This work includes the variation of α as a function of resist thickness, and compares these values to those inferred from Monte Carlo simulations. We also discuss the dependence of α on resist developer and the effects of distortions from the developer meniscus. © 2005 American Vacuum Society.