Vicki L Hanson, Edward H Lichtenstein
Cognitive Psychology
State-of-the-art approaches for Knowledge Base Completion (KBC) exploit deep neural networks trained with both false and true assertions: positive assertions are explicitly taken from the knowledge base, whereas negative ones are generated by random sampling of entities. In this paper, we argue that random sampling is not a good training strategy since it is highly likely to generate a huge number of nonsensical assertions during training, which does not provide relevant training signal to the system. Hence, it slows down the learning process and decreases accuracy. To address this issue, we propose an alternative approach called Distributional Negative Sampling that generates meaningful negative examples which are highly likely to be false. Our approach achieves a significant improvement in Mean Reciprocal Rank values amongst two different KBC algorithms in three standard academic benchmarks.
Vicki L Hanson, Edward H Lichtenstein
Cognitive Psychology
Saurabh Paul, Christos Boutsidis, et al.
JMLR
Barry K. Rosen
SWAT 1972
Daniel Karl I. Weidele, Hendrik Strobelt, et al.
SysML 2019