About cookies on this site Our websites require some cookies to function properly (required). In addition, other cookies may be used with your consent to analyze site usage, improve the user experience and for advertising. For more information, please review your options. By visiting our website, you agree to our processing of information as described in IBM’sprivacy statement. To provide a smooth navigation, your cookie preferences will be shared across the IBM web domains listed here.
Publication
Medical Physics
Paper
Viewing angle performance of medical liquid crystal displays
Abstract
Cathode-ray tube (CRT) and liquid crystal display (LCD) are currently two main technologies for displaying medical images. LCDs possess a number of advantages, but their performance varies as a function of viewing angle. Our purpose in this study was to characterize the angular response performance of five medical-grade LCDs, and to substantiate their impact on their compliance with the DICOM gray scale display function (GSDF). Furthermore, the study aimed to test a framework to define an angular acceptance range for medical LCDs based on the recent AAPM TG18 guidelines. Measurements were made on five calibrated dual-domain LCDs, including two 3 megapixel monochrome LCDs, two 5 megapixel monochrome LCDs, and one 9 megapixel color LCD. The luminance performance of each display device was measured as a function of the viewing angle at 17 discrete levels using TG18-LN test patterns and a Fourier-optics-based luminance meter. The luminance data were analyzed according to the AAPM TG18 methodology. The displays showed notable variation in luminance and contrast performance as a function of the viewing angle, particularly in diagonal viewing orientations. Overall, the luminance ratio remained greater than 175 within ±20° and ±33° viewing angle cones (β175 =20°-33°). Aiming to maintain a maximum deviation from the GSDF contrast less than 0.3, i.e., κ17 ≤0.3, acceptable viewing angle cones of ±22° and ±35° were indicated (α0.3=22°-35°). The findings demonstrate the significant impact of angular response on image contrast, and the utility of α0.3 and β175 quantities for defining the viewing angle cones within which a medical LCD device can be effectively utilized. © 2006 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.