Reply to Boglione and Pennington

In a recent article we presented an argument which, we believe, shows to be incorrect an estimate by Boglione and Pennington of corrections to the valence (quenched) approximation predictions for the properties of the lightest scalar glueball. The Boglione-Pennington reply to our article, it appears to us, fails to address the specific technical issues we raised. © 2000 The American Physical Society.