About cookies on this site Our websites require some cookies to function properly (required). In addition, other cookies may be used with your consent to analyze site usage, improve the user experience and for advertising. For more information, please review your options. By visiting our website, you agree to our processing of information as described in IBM’sprivacy statement. To provide a smooth navigation, your cookie preferences will be shared across the IBM web domains listed here.
Publication
Physical Review
Paper
Comparison of hindered-rotor and tunneling models for dipolar impurities in cubic crystals
Abstract
In alkali-halide crystals, dipolar impurities such as CN- and OH- exhibit energy-level spacings of 0.1-2 cm-1 due to a reorientational type of motion. One calculation of these energy-level spacings is on the basis of a hindered-rotor model, which expresses the rotational motion as a linear combination of spherical-harmonic wave functions. This model is applicable when small or medium potential-energy barriers hinder the rotation. The tunneling model calculates these same energy levels by allowing localized harmonic-oscillator wave functions to overlap the equivalent wave functions in neighboring (but differently oriented) potential wells. The latter model was derived by Gomez et al. only for off-center point masses; furthermore, this model is primarily applicable to cases involving medium or large potential barriers. The present work reformulates the tunneling-model results, so that they are applicable to the cases of rotating polyatomic impurities. It then becomes evident that the two models predict quite similar energy-level spacings over a large range of intermediate barrier heights. An interesting prediction is obtained by utilizing both the hindered-rotor and tunneling models to analyze experimental results from the KCI:Li+ system. In contrast to the tunneling model alone, the present combination of models provides a straightforward interpretation for the two observed resonance lines. Also it is suggested that a third line may not have been observed because of the limited energy (1.2 cm-1) of microwave photons utilized in the resonance experiment. © 1969 The American Physical Society.