Richard Tomsett, Alun Preece, et al.
Patterns
The story of machine learning in general, and its application to molecular design in particular, has been a tale of evolving representations of data. Understanding the implications of the use of a particular representation – including the existence of so-called ‘activity cliffs’ for cheminformatics models – is the key to their successful use for molecular discovery. In this work we present a physics-inspired methodology which exploits analogies between model response surfaces and energy landscapes to richly describe the relationship between the representation and the model. From these similarities, a metric emerges which is analogous to the commonly used frustration metric from the chemical physics community. This new property shows state-of-the-art prediction of model error, whilst belonging to a novel class of roughness measure that extends beyond the known data allowing the trivial identification of activity cliffs even in the absence of related training or evaluation data.
Richard Tomsett, Alun Preece, et al.
Patterns
George Kour, Marcel Zalmanovici, et al.
EMNLP 2023
Daiki Kimura, Tatsuya Ishikawa, et al.
IPSJ 2024
Taku Ito, Luca Cocchi, et al.
ICML 2025