About cookies on this site Our websites require some cookies to function properly (required). In addition, other cookies may be used with your consent to analyze site usage, improve the user experience and for advertising. For more information, please review your options. By visiting our website, you agree to our processing of information as described in IBM’sprivacy statement. To provide a smooth navigation, your cookie preferences will be shared across the IBM web domains listed here.
February 2021 - Solution
A minimal set of cells contains 35 cells. One possible set is
[(11, 3), (9, 1), (7, 8), (5, 11), (7, 11), (8, 10), (9, 10), (10, 11), (11, 11), (9, 9), (10, 8), (11, 9), (11, 7), (11, 6), (4, 12), (2, 11), (2, 7), (2, 6), (4, 5), (4, 7), (5, 8), (4, 9), (2, 2), (2, 4), (2, 5), (5, 4), (6, 5), (7, 5), (8, 4), (9, 5), (10, 5), (11, 4), (4, 2), (6, 2), (5, 3)]
A simple way to simplify finding such a set is to compute the strongly connected components of the dependency graph; each connected component can be handled independently (and they are small enough for brute-force solutions).
To generate a board with a minimal set of size 42, one can join several disconnected components and obtain the sum of their respective sets. One simple way to do this is
222222000000 aaaaaa000000 888888000000 222222222222 aaaaaaaaaaaa 888888888888 222222222222 aaaaaaaaaaaa 888888888888 222222222222 aaaaaaaaaaaa 888888888888
Sent by Thomas Pircher. But many similar methods exist. (The number 42 proved too easy, but I am biased towards it.)