About cookies on this site Our websites require some cookies to function properly (required). In addition, other cookies may be used with your consent to analyze site usage, improve the user experience and for advertising. For more information, please review your options. By visiting our website, you agree to our processing of information as described in IBM’sprivacy statement. To provide a smooth navigation, your cookie preferences will be shared across the IBM web domains listed here.
August 2012
<<July August September>>
One can get to a zero force by choosing three co-linear points, for example (12,12); (-15,-15); and (-20,-20). That is why we asked for the three points to be from three different quadrants.
Another direction is to take an equilateral triangle and perturbate it a little to fit the integer lattice; for example (197,993); (-959,-326); and (761,-668), which gives a force of 1.6e-12.
Another way to solve it is by using the template (x,-y); (-y,x); and (z,z), which gives the best solution (1074,-255); (-255,1074); and (762,762), which gives a force of 6e-15.
Going over all the possible points in the sphere, we get (411,987); (-321,688); and (106,-635), for a force of 4e-15.
We were looking for points inside the quadrants, i.e., not on the axes, but five of you (Kurt Hectic; Jo�l Bleuse; Deane Stewart; Arthur Breitman; and Hugo Pfoertner) sent us the solution (0, -814); (-608, 197); (608, 197) which applies a force of 3.2e-15 and one can argue that you can choose either quadrant for the 0,-814 point.
Multiplying a given solution by a constant reduces the force, which is why we added the sphere constraint. If you ignore it - can we get to a zero force?
If you have any problems you think we might enjoy, please send them in. All replies should be sent to: ponder@il.ibm.com