About cookies on this site Our websites require some cookies to function properly (required). In addition, other cookies may be used with your consent to analyze site usage, improve the user experience and for advertising. For more information, please review your options. By visiting our website, you agree to our processing of information as described in IBM’sprivacy statement. To provide a smooth navigation, your cookie preferences will be shared across the IBM web domains listed here.
Abstract
We propose two binary-valued lexical features of passive morphemes and show that the interaction of the values assigned to these features for the passive morpheme(s) in a language explains the cross-linguistic possibilities for impersonal and in situ transitive passive formation. One feature marks a passive morpheme as a +/— theta-role bearer. The second feature determines whether it is a +/— strong Case absorber. We show that our lexical-feature-based account of the main syntactic properties of passive morphemes provides a more comprehensive and unified explanation of the facts of passivization in a wide variety of languages than competing Case-based theories. © 1993 Walter de Gruyter